Sunday, July 27, 2008

養生蔬菜湯

養生蔬 菜湯的成份及效能

立石和博士在一千五百種植物中,經過精密的研究與實驗,從中篩選出五種蔬菜作為「養生蔬菜湯」的 成份。

   你知道嗎?土壤中奧秘遠超過我們的想像!你隨意抓起的少量土壤中,不僅存在著日本總人口數等量的微生素、抗生物質,也是製造盤尼西林等藥物的來源。從這 樣神奇的自然土壤中發芽長大的蔬菜,自然接收了它豐富的微生素與營養素之滋養,尤其是在太陽光下,它將全部吸收我們人體健康管理上不可或缺的葉綠素、葉 酸、鐵、磷、鈣、礦物質、微生素及微量元素等豐富的營養。

  在日本有「神奇野菜湯」之稱的養生蔬菜湯,是由體細胞科學家立石和博士所發明,他由超過1500種動物植物配方試驗中,研究找出以五種蔬菜神奇組合,即:白蘿蔔、蘿蔔葉、胡蘿蔔、牛蒡、香菇以一定比例燜煮湯汁。
veggi
成分一:白蘿蔔
西 醫稱讚蘿蔔的豐富營養價值。蘿蔔含有之營養素包括:高量膳食纖維、維生素A、維生素B群、維生素C、維生素E、維生素P、各種礦物質如鐵、磷、鉀、鈣等。 其中維生素C含量是檸檬的兩倍, 維生素C可促進鐵的吸收。蘿蔔中鈣質含量亦十分豐富,是菠菜的兩倍以上,多補充鈣質可幫助預防骨質 疏鬆。蘿蔔還含有高量消 化酵素澱粉,對幫助維持消化道機能很有益。值得注意的是:蘿蔔的營養成分大部分儲存在蘿蔔皮裡,如果吃的是削掉蘿蔔皮的蘿蔔,營養價值則只剩一半。

veggi

成分二:蘿蔔葉
蘿 蔔葉中含有極驚人的價值,有蛋白質、醣類、礦物質鐵、鈣、磷、維生素A先質(
β胡蘿蔔 素)、維生素B群、維生素C等。其中維生素A先質(β胡蘿蔔 素)可幫 助預防夜盲。而蘿蔔葉所含的β胡蘿蔔 素是青花菜的三倍。維生素B1含量是豆類的六倍。維生素B2含量是牛奶的兩倍。維生素C含量是橘子的2.5倍,檸檬的 十倍。鐵的含量是肝臟及鰻魚的三倍。鈣的含量是菠菜的四倍。從以上資料可以看出蘿蔔葉的營養價值驚人,並可以幫助人體營養的供給。

veggi
成分 三:紅蘿蔔
西醫認為胡蘿蔔含有大量維生素A先質(即
β胡蘿蔔 素)、維生素B1、維生素B2、維生素C、維生素P、葉酸、蔗糖、葡萄糖、澱粉、木質素,以及礦物質如鐵、 鈣、磷、氟、錳、鈷等礦物質及微量元素。其中維生素A含量更高達一萬三千IU,居所有食物之冠。

veggi
成分四:香菇
香菇含有營養包括:但蛋白質、維生素B群、維 生素D1及礦物質、微量元素鋅和硒。香菇經過日曬,才可產生維生素D。另外香菇含有「香菇多醣」,「香菇多醣」可以活化微量元素鋅和硒。

veggi

成分 五:牛蒡
牛 蒡營養價值豐富,含有高量粗纖維、菊醣、蛋白質、維生素A、維生素B1、菸鹼酸、維生素C及礦物質如鉀、鐵、鈣、磷等。其中粗纖維可以刺激大腸蠕動、使排 便順暢、幫助降低體內廢物囤積。所有根菜類之中,食物纖維含量最多的就是牛蒡,它的水溶性纖維與不溶性纖維各佔一半,可以使乳酸菌更活潑,徹底發揮使排便 順暢。


Saturday, July 26, 2008

Can You Trust Chemotherapy to Cure Your Cancer?

(NaturalNews) Former White House press secretary Tony Snow died in July 2008 at the age of 53, following a series of chemotherapy treatments for colon cancer. In 2005, Snow had his colon removed and underwent six months of chemotherapy after being diagnosed with colon cancer. Two years later (2007), Snow underwent surgery to remove a growth in his abdominal area, near the site of the original cancer. "This is a very treatable condition," said Dr. Allyson Ocean, a gastrointestinal oncologist at Weill Cornell Medical College. "Many patients, because of the therapies we have, are able to work and live full lives with quality while they're being treated. Anyone who looks at this as a death sentence is wrong." But of course we now know, Dr. Ocean was dead wrong.

The media headlines proclaimed Snow died from colon cancer, although they knew he didn't have a colon anymore. Apparently, the malignant cancer had "returned" (from where?) and "spread" to the liver and elsewhere in his body. In actual fact, the colon surgery severely restricted his normal eliminative functions, thereby overburdening the liver and tissue fluids with toxic waste. The previous series of chemo-treatments inflamed and irreversibly damaged a large number of cells in his body, and also impaired his immune system -- a perfect recipe for growing new cancers. Now unable to heal the causes of the original cancer (in addition to the newly created ones), Snow's body developed new cancers in the liver and other parts of the body.

The mainstream media, of course, still insist Snow died from colon cancer, thus perpetuating the myth that it is only the cancer that kills people, not the treatment. Nobody seems to raise the important point that it is extremely difficult for a cancer patient to actually heal from this condition while being subjected to the systemic poisons of chemotherapy and deadly radiation. If you are bitten by a poisonous snake and don't get an antidote for it, isn't it likely that your body becomes overwhelmed by the poison and, therefore, cannot function anymore?

Before Tony Snow began his chemo-treatments for his second colon cancer, he still looked healthy and strong. But after a few weeks into his treatment, he started to develop a coarse voice, looked frail, turned gray and lost his hair. Did the cancer do all this to him? Certainly not. Cancer doesn't do such a thing, but chemical poisoning does. He actually looked more ill than someone who has been bitten by a poisonous snake.

Does the mainstream media ever report about the overwhelming scientific evidence that shows chemotherapy has zero benefits in the five-year survival rate of colon cancer patients? Or how many oncologists stand up for their cancer patients and protect them against chemotherapy treatment which they very well know can cause them to die far more quickly than if they received no treatment at all? Can you trustingly place your life into their hands when you know that most of them would not even consider chemotherapy for themselves if they were diagnosed with cancer? What do they know that you don't? The news is spreading fast that in the United States physician-caused fatalities now exceed 750,000 each year. Perhaps, many doctors no longer trust in what they practice, for good reasons.

"Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy... Chemotherapy does not eliminate breast, colon or lung cancers. This fact has been documented for over a decade. Yet doctors still use chemotherapy for these tumors... Women with breast cancer are likely to die faster with chemo than without it." - Alan Levin, M.D.

An investigation by the Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Australia, into the contribution of chemotherapy to 5-year survival in 22 major adult malignancies, showed startling results: The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA." [Royal North Shore Hospital Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2005 Jun;17(4):294.]

The research covered data from the Cancer Registry in Australia and the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results in the USA for the year 1998. The current 5-year relative adult survival rate for cancer in Australia is over 60%, and no less than that in the USA. By comparison, a mere 2.3% contribution of chemotherapy to cancer survival does not justify the massive expense involved and the tremendous suffering patients experience because of severe, toxic side effects resulting from this treatment. With a meager success rate of 2.3%, selling chemotherapy as a medical treatment (instead of a scam), is one of the greatest fraudulent acts ever committed. The average chemotherapy earns the medical establishment a whopping $300,000 to $1,000,000 each year, and has so far earned those who promote this pseudo-medication (poison) over 1 trillion dollars. It's no surprise that the medical establishment tries to keep this scam alive for as long as possible.

In 1990, the highly respected German epidemiologist, Dr. Ulrich Abel from the Tumor Clinic of the University of Heidelberg, conducted the most comprehensive investigation of every major clinical study on chemotherapy drugs ever done. Abel contacted 350 medical centers and asked them to send him anything they had ever published on chemotherapy. He also reviewed and analyzed thousands of scientific articles published in the most prestigious medical journals. It took Abel several years to collect and evaluate the data. Abel's epidemiological study, which was published on August 10, 1991 in The Lancet, should have alerted every doctor and cancer patient about the risks of one of the most common treatments used for cancer and other diseases. In his paper, Abel came to the conclusion that the overall success rate of chemotherapy was "appalling." According to this report, there was no scientific evidence available in any existing study to show that chemotherapy can "extend in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most common organic cancers."

Abel points out that chemotherapy rarely improves the quality of life. He describes chemotherapy as "a scientific wasteland" and states that even though there is no scientific evidence that chemotherapy works, neither doctor nor patient is willing to give up on it. The mainstream media has never reported on this hugely important study, which is hardly surprising, given the enormous vested interests of the groups that sponsor the media, that is, the pharmaceutical companies. A recent search turned up exactly zero reviews of Abel's work in American journals, even though it was published in 1990. I believe this is not because his work was unimportant -- but because it is irrefutable.

The truth of the matter would be far too costly for the pharmaceutical industry to bear, thus making it unacceptable. If the mass media reported the truth that medical drugs, including chemotherapy drugs, are used to practically commit genocide in the U.S. and the world, their best sponsors (the pharmaceutical companies) would have to withdraw their misleading advertisements from the television media, radio stations, magazines, and newspapers. But neither group wants to go bankrupt.

Many doctors go as far as prescribing chemotherapy drugs to patients for malignancies that are far too advanced for surgery, with the full knowledge that there are no benefits at all. Yet they claim chemotherapy to be an effective cancer treatment, and their unsuspecting patients believe that "effective" equals "cure." The doctors, of course, refer to the FDA's definition of an "effective" drug, one which achieves a 50% or more reduction in tumor size for 28 days. They neglect to tell their patients that there is no correlation whatsoever between shrinking tumors for 28 days and curing the cancer or extending life. Temporary tumor shrinkage through chemotherapy has never been shown to cure cancer or to extend life. In other words, you can live with an untreated tumor for just as long as you would with one that has been shrunken or been eliminated by chemotherapy (or radiation).

Chemotherapy has never been shown to have curative effects for cancer. By contrast, the body can still cure itself, which it actually tries to do by developing cancer. Cancer is more a healing response than it is a disease. The "disease" is the body's attempt to cure itself of an existing imbalance. And sometimes, this healing response continues even if a person is subjected to chemotherapy (and/or radiation). Unfortunately, as the previously mentioned research has demonstrated, the chances for a real cure are greatly reduced when patients are treated with chemotherapy drugs.

The side effects of the treatment can be horrendous and heartbreaking for both patients and their loved ones, all in the name of trustworthy medical treatment. Although the drug treatment comes with the promise to improve the patient's quality of life, it is just common sense that a drug that makes them throw up and lose their hair, while wrecking their immune system, is doing the exact opposite. Chemo-therapy can give the patient life-threatening mouth sores. It attacks the immune system by destroying billions of immune cells (white blood cells). Its deadly poisons inflame every part of the body. The drugs can slough off the entire lining of their intestines. The most common side effect experienced among chemo patients is their complete lack of energy. The new additional drugs now given to many chemo patients may prevent the patient from noticing some of the side effects, but they hardly reduce the immensely destructive and suppressive effect of the chemotherapy itself. Remember, the reason chemotherapy can shrink some tumors is because it causes massive destruction in the body.

If you have cancer, you may think that feeling tired is just part of the disease. This rarely is the case. Feeling unusually tired is more likely due to anemia, a common side effect of most chemotherapy drugs. Chemo drugs can dramatically decrease your red blood cell levels, and this reduces oxygen availability to the 60-100 trillion cells of your body. You can literally feel the energy being zapped from every cell of your body -- a physical death without dying. Chemo-caused fatigue has a negative impact on day-to-day activities in 89% of all patients. With no energy, there can be no joy and no hope, and all bodily functions become subdued.

One long-term side effect is that these patients' bodies can no longer respond to nutritional or immune-strengthening approaches to cancerous tumors. All of this may explain why cancer patients who do not receive any treatment at all, have an up to four times higher remission rate than those who receive treatment. The sad thing is that chemotherapy does not cure 96% to 98% of all cancers anyway. Conclusive evidence (for the majority of cancers) that chemotherapy has any positive influence on survival or quality of life does not exist.

To promote chemotherapy as a treatment for cancer is misleading, to say the least. By permanently damaging the body's immune system and other important parts, chemo-therapy has become a leading cause of treatment-caused diseases such as heart disease, liver disease, intestinal diseases, diseases of the immune system, infections, brain diseases, pain disorders, and rapid aging.

Before committing themselves to being poisoned, cancer patients need to question their doctors and ask them to produce the research or evidence that shrinking a tumor actually translates to any increase in survival. If they tell you that chemotherapy is your best chance of surviving, you will know they are lying or are simply misinformed. As Abel's research clearly demonstrated, there is no such evidence anywhere to be found in the medical literature. Subjecting patients to chemotherapy robs them of a fair chance of finding or responding to a real cure and deserves criminal prosecution.

Andreas Moritz's book, Cancer is not a Disease - It's a Survival Mechanism, explains the root causes of cancer and how to eliminate them for good. Available through (www.ener-chi.com) or (www.amazon.com) .

About the author
Andreas Moritz is a medical intuitive; a practitioner of Ayurveda, iridology, shiatsu, and vibrational medicine; a writer; and an artist. He is the author of The Amazing Liver and Gallbladder Flush, Timeless Secrets of Health and Rejuvenation, Lifting the Veil of Duality, Cancer Is Not a Disease, It's Time to Come Alive, Heart Disease No More, Diabetes No More, Simple Steps to Total Health, Diabetes -- No More, Ending the AIDS Myth and Heal Yourself with Sunlight. For more information, visit the author's website (www.ener-chi.com).

Saturday, July 19, 2008

CT SCANS PROMOTE CANCER

Full-body CT scans expose patients to approximately 100 times the radiation of a standard chest X-ray. Any radiation exposure is known to increase the risk of cancer, in particular, radiation in high doses.

Refer below link for more detail.
http://www.naturalnews.com/023582.html

Thursday, July 3, 2008

Alkaline Water










Properties of Alkaline Ionic Water

Powerfull Antioxidant
Loaded with negative ions of ORP - 400mV, alkaline Ionic Water is the all-Natural defence against Free Radicals. Medical studies show that alkaline ionic water has the most powerful anti-oxidant properties, better than vitamins A,C,E beta-carotene and selenium, which can improve the human body's defences against cancer.

Rich in Dissolved Oxygen
Alkaline ionic water has 5 times more oxygen than boiled, distilled or RO water. German Nobel laureate Dr. Otto Warberg discovered that cancer is caused by lack of oxygen. The abundant oxygen in alkaline ionic water would, therefore, help our body to prevent the formation of cancerous cells.

Loaded with Ionic minerals
Through the process of electrolysis, minerals in the water are physically separated to form positive and negative ionic minerals. The human body can easily absorb the positive ionic minerals. Nobel laureate, Linus Pauling, found out that a deficiency in minerals causes all diseases.

Right PH balance
Alkaline ionic water with a PH from 9.5 to 10 helps to restore the right PH balance in our bodies. Acidification of the human body could lead to degenerative diseases. The Japanese medical doctor and Director of the Water Institute of Japan, Dr. Hidemitsu Hayashi, discovered that body cells in an acidic environment mutate to form malignant or cancerous cells,

Smallest Molecute Cluster
Alkaline ionic water has six water molecules in a cluster, constituted in a hexagonal shape. The smaller clusters of water molecules are able to travel 6 times faster than normal water molecules in our body, thus bringing nutrients to and removing acidic toxins from out body cells more efficiently.

Wednesday, July 2, 2008

喝蔬菜湯半年腦瘤結痂‧左身癱瘓也痊癒

(雪 蘭莪‧八打靈再也)公司董事長林心笛一次到國外出差時,眼睛突然往上吊,身體還抽搐,洗頭髮時,整個頭更往浴缸栽下去。她馬上返回大馬就醫,卻被誤診為憂 鬱症。幸虧她仍努力就醫,最終才確診為腦部長腫瘤。醫生說,不開刀只有死路,可是開了刀卻發現腫瘤長在血管上,無法切除。她因而左半身癱瘓,但不認輸的她 展開“自救行動”,向日本友人拿蔬菜湯,每天當開水飲用。半年後,醫生證實她的腫瘤已消失,只剩一個痂。

林心笛現年50歲。她記得,2000年8月杪病發時,她人在國外,眼睛突然往上吊,身體還抽搐。她洗頭髮時,整個頭部更往浴缸栽下去,費了很大的勁才把頭抬起來。她覺得很不舒服,當下的想法就是要趕回國,不想客死異鄉,一下飛機就趕去醫院。

經過腦波斷層掃描後,醫生只說她壓力太大,有憂鬱症,只給她吃藥,可是情況依舊。她服藥後出現許多副作用,如便秘、大腸躁郁症、腹部脹大等。她改向神經內科求診,醫生說,檢查顯示她的腦部正常,應是憂鬱症中的躁鬱症。

白挨一刀致半身癱瘓

“我認為不對,因為我的症狀和這兩種病症不同,和醫生據理力爭卻無濟於事。我嘗試各種診斷,最終確定腦部生腫瘤,動手術不一定會好,但不動手術只有死路一途。”

林心笛別無選擇,只好往手術床一躺。

然而,老天不從人願,她的腫瘤長在血管上,稍有差池會血崩,醫生無計可施,只好縫回去,判她只有半年的生存期。那刻,她感到萬分不甘心,她覺得老天至少該給她一些訊號,讓她能及時採取方法解決。

白挨一刀的她,左邊身體癱瘓了,只能躺在床上,或依賴輪椅代步。她一直苦思如何治病,因為她深信留得青山在,不怕沒柴燒,“我一定要活下來”。

喝3個月已無需輪椅

她忽然想到日本友人患末期肝癌後靠喝蔬菜湯痊癒的事,也許可從中找到希望,便趕緊聯絡他。友人給她寄來蔬菜湯包,含有白蘿蔔、蘿蔔葉、紅蘿蔔、香菇和牛蒡。她把蔬菜湯當開水飲用,一連喝了3天後,覺得身體疼痛,但感到“疼痛中有一絲的舒服。”

她認真執行這招自救法,喝了3個月,檢查結果顯示腫瘤消了一半,她也可從輪椅上站起來。醫生對這結果嘖嘖稱奇,和她討論療方的可行性。她繼續努力半年後,醫生證實腫瘤已消失,只剩一個結痂。

憑父教誨勇戰病魔

林心笛說,父親是個軍人,說話習慣用命令式,愛在心裡卻口難開。

她入院時,89歲的父親親身去醫院探望她,並給了她一封紅包,告訴她:“你要好好活下來。”那一瞬間,她才知道父親有多疼愛她。

提及父親,她的眼角有淚光。她說,父親素來教導孩子:有問題就要面對,不管結果好或不好,至少沒有遺憾。她就是懷抱著父親的教誨,面對病魔的考驗。

“我生病時不敢讓他知道,擔心他受不了。他來醫院看我的10天後,沒病沒痛就走了……患有糖尿病的兄長忙著辦理父親的身後事和照顧我,也因壓力太大,突然有併發症而逝世……”

呆洗手間自理半年

林心笛動了手術出院後,雖然左邊身體癱瘓,手腳不能動彈,不過她討厭依賴他人,也不要用成人尿片。於是,她要家人在洗手間裝置電視機,把她“關在”裡面,以便可就地解決如廁問題。

吃飯時,她就像狗趴著吃。她唯一的娛樂就是看電視節目。那半年的大多數時間就這樣呆在洗手間。

“那時我的脾氣很槽糕,時好時壞。心情好時就想振作起來,心情低落時又想死。我一度想像電視劇的人物推著輪椅,衝向窗戶,從窗口跌下去,一了百了。我真的做了,但我的想法被窗架卡住了,結果撿回一命。

“我想,我連自殺的能力也沒有,既然自殺不了,只有活下去。”

不因夫外遇而氣餒

林心笛坦言,生病期間她獲悉先生有外遇,雪上加霜,更糟的是第三者還打電話來譏諷她:“你怎麼不死,還開刀搏同情?”她也不甘示弱地回應:“今天他背叛我,他日也會背叛你,不要忘了現世報!”她矢言要活得比他們好。

“我發現,自己不理會先生的外遇,心情會比較好,就不理他了。”

話雖如此,她還是在先生的要求下,幫忙處理他的外遇,包括每月支付約2000令吉給對方,長達2年。在這過程中,她學會了放開和包容。

“康復後,我覺得人生無常,不要太計較。人生是很難算的賬,太計較,就變得沒有福氣。”

改善飲食及解壓保健

日理萬機的林心笛處理壓力的方法很簡單實用,即每天發呆半小時,不說話、不想事情。臨睡前,她聆聽音樂,期許自己以愉悅的心情與周公會面。她也依靠靜坐來解除壓力。

現在的她仍按時飲用蔬菜湯,飲食盡可能以五顏六色、有機天然的食材為主,並力行不吃“五白”,即白米、白糖、白鹽、白麵包及白麵粉的原則。

“生病前,我甚麼都吃,常吃炸雞、牛扒。現在我會想,要吃正確和有益身心的食物,不會逞口腹之欲了。”

光明日報/良醫‧2008.06.28